Law in the Internet Society

View   r3  >  r2  >  r1
TiffanyYoungFirstEssay 3 - 27 Dec 2017 - Main.TiffanyYoung
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="FirstEssay"
Line: 10 to 10
 

Destruction of Human Connection

Changed:
<
<
Social media promises to help us keep connected with our friends no matter where we are. Yet, by subscribing to this, we destroy the connections closest to us. The common complaint about millennials being addicted to their phones is not completely ungrounded. It’s hard to ignore the incessant pings of phone notifications from endless accounts – Instagram, Facebook, Snapchat – linked to your phone. When everything is an instant notification, it’s nearly impossible to focus on any task lasting longer than a few minutes, including spending time with real, physical people.
>
>
Social media promises to help us keep connected with our friends no matter where we are. Yet, by subscribing to this, we destroy the connections closest to us. When everything is an instant notification, it’s nearly impossible to focus on any task lasting longer than a few minutes, including spending time with real, physical people.
 
Changed:
<
<
I often find myself sitting at dinner with several friends, yet failing to find a single pair of eyes to connect with because everyone is glued to their screens. I have also often sat with a grumbling stomach even though food was right in front of me because my friends had decided taking a photo for the internet was more pressing than nourishing our bodies (I would be forbidden from touching my order while they arranged and rearranged the table settings to capture the perfect photo). And unfortunately, I have too often simply given up after repeating a story twice or thrice, ultimately opting to also simply pick up my phone. The problem is, they realize it’s rude. These actions are constantly accompanied with a “sorry I’ll be done really soon,” yet they continue throughout the meetup. Like addictions to drugs, addictions to devices can ruin relationships.
>
>
I often find myself sitting at dinner with friends, yet failing to find a single pair of eyes to connect with because everyone is glued to their screens. I have also often sat with a grumbling stomach because my friends had decided that taking a photo for the internet was more pressing than nourishing our bodies (I would be forbidden from touching my order as they arranged and rearranged the table settings to capture the perfect photo). And unfortunately, I often give up after repeating a story twice or thrice, ultimately opting to also simply pick up my phone. The problem is, they realize it’s rude. These actions are constantly accompanied with a “sorry I’ll be done soon,” yet they continue throughout the meetup. I believe this addiction to the internet is both rooted in social anxiety and a changing of standards.
 
Changed:
<
<

Destruction of Self

The breakdown is not just happening around us; it is happening within us. We are so enthralled with the online world that it has even changed how we view ourselves. Studies have shown that exposure to social media is correlated to lower self-esteem. At the same time, the thing that brings so much grief also brings great pleasure. Our brains release dopamine every time we get a positive response on social media, and it is this physical response that makes leaving social media so difficult. I suspect the desperate need to prove that we are worthy both to ourselves and to friends on social media drives us further into its gaping maws. Because being on social media lowers self-esteem, online validation means even more to us, leading to more posting and sharing.

Furthermore, the constant bombardment of information means never experiencing boredom again…yet never truly engaging our minds either. Less time is spent with introspection or pondering deeper issues because our brains are never in “default mode” anymore, where we ponder the day’s events and life in general.

>
>
In an age where hitting a “like” button and sending an occasional message is enough to maintain friendships, failure to do so suddenly means dropping relationships and spending time with people means going above and beyond. Because notifications are instantaneous, responses are also expected to be instantaneous. People are so afraid of being disliked that they must respond immediately to prove their interest in a relationship. The same reasoning applies to online sharing: receiving “likes” and comments is interpreted as signs of friendship. The flip side of the coin is the expectation that using the phone while with company, though rude, will be forgiven. After all, they’re already taking time to actually be with you, what more could you ask?
 
Changed:
<
<
Rather than thinking of this as "default mode," you might use the concept of "turning attention inward." This inward-facing attention, which is also called "interiority," is the basic functional component of what we used to call "the self." Distortion of our attention system through too-insistent stimulation of the external senses compelling attention to be paid outward distorts the self. At the extreme, when it prevents sleep, it causes permanent, potentially fatal, damage to the mind and body. Attaching oneself to a spy-object that aggressively, sporadically, frequently conscripts your attention creates this distortion and interferes with the ongoing synthesis of "the self" through introspection.

>
>

Destruction of Self

 
Added:
>
>
The breakdown is not just happening around us; it is happening within us. We are so enthralled with the online world that it has even changed how we view ourselves. Studies have shown that exposure to social media is correlated to lower self-esteem. At the same time, our brains release dopamine every time we get a positive response on social media, and it is this physical response that makes leaving social media so difficult. I suspect the desperate need to prove that we are worthy both to ourselves and to friends online drives us further into social media’s gaping maws. Because being on social media lowers self-esteem, online validation means even more to us, leading to more posting and sharing.
 
Changed:
<
<
We also exercise our memories less since any information we want is at our fingertips. And studies have shown multitasking leads to less productivity and efficiency, but again, it is nearly impossible to ignore the endless pings that demand our attention. So, as technology grows ever more cognitive, our brains grow ever less.
>
>
Furthermore, the constant bombardment of information means never experiencing boredom again…but never truly engaging our minds either. We are slowly losing our sense of self because we spend less time with introspection and pondering about the day’s events or life in general. We also exercise our memories less since any information we want is at our fingertips. Studies have shown multitasking leads to less productivity and efficiency, but it is nearly impossible to ignore the endless pings that demand our attention. So, as technology grows ever more cognitive, our brains grow ever less.
 

Destruction of Trust

Changed:
<
<
Rather than trusting other humans, it seems people are choosing to place their trust in the very companies that aim to manipulate them. The introduction of Amazon Key is a prime (no pun intended) example. Amazon Key is a keypad door lock that comes with a security camera and an app. We don’t trust our neighbors to not steal our packages, yet we trust Amazon to enter our homes. And indeed, people are now handing a retail company real-time footage of their homes as well as the passcodes to their front doors.

A more personal anecdote of people placing their trust in technology and the companies that control it: my mother is a very private woman, who refuses even to use her real name on Facebook. Yet, she has no problem telling her phone “OK Google, take me home,” even though she acknowledges she never actually entered her home address. It seems there is a sense of security with our technology. Perhaps it’s the fact that our phones are always beside us – our trusty right-hand robot – so we can lull ourselves into believing there aren’t people behind our devices. But this lack of understanding (perhaps even self-deception) is exactly why China’s social credit plan even has a chance of working.

Baby Steps

It is easier to never get into this kind of perpetually plugged-in life than it is to exit after experiencing the convenience. Many of my friends have attempted repeatedly to deleted social media applications from their phones but would inevitably cave and reinstall after a few weeks. Luckily, I never made the initial download, though even then it was hard to put down my phone since it could access the web anywhere.

I think the approach my friends took was not quite right; we have built a way of life around our devices, so we will need time to remove ourselves from that. I think it is possible to grow independent of our electronic minds, albeit slowly and possibly requiring a safety net. I have recently turned off my phone data entirely; I now only use it as a telephone while on the go and utilize its computing capabilities while on to a trusted web connection. Of course, I still have a data plan, so I know if I really need it (say, if I was hopelessly lost in a new city) I could always pull up Google Maps.

There used to be a thing called "asking directions." It still works.

But I think riding a bike with training wheels is still better than just letting someone else take the wheel.

>
>
Rather than trusting other humans, it seems people are placing their trust in the very companies that aim to manipulate them. The introduction of Amazon Key is a prime (no pun intended) example. Amazon Key is a keypad door lock that comes with a security camera and an app. We don’t trust our neighbors to not steal our packages, yet we trust Amazon to enter our homes. And indeed, people are now handing a retail company real-time footage of their homes as well as the passcodes to their front doors.
 
Changed:
<
<
>
>
A more personal anecdote: my mother is a very private woman, who refuses even to use her real name on Facebook. Yet, she has no problem telling her phone “OK Google, take me home,” even though she acknowledges she never entered her home address. Perhaps, because our phones are our trusty right-hand robots, we can lull ourselves into believing there aren’t people behind our devices. But this lack of understanding (maybe even self-deception) is exactly why China’s social credit plan even has a chance of working.
 
Changed:
<
<
But the machine is still there, even if you have partially disabled it. As your last hypothesis about getting lost and being helpless shows, it still functions as an amulet against your anxiety. It does so by convincing you that you only need it in order to avoid being lost, that you have no external dependency on society or other people that isn't satisfied by the Net and the spy-object you carry. As your dinner-table story shows, it is still necessary in order to quell the social anxiety people feel in being together, which they can stabilize by showing the food to other people far away, and losing themselves at the table in places that require less risk and vulnerability than actual conversation.
>
>

Crippled by Technology

 
Changed:
<
<
So the next draft should be not about the price of convenience only, but also about the price of anxiety-reduction. About why it is that people don't feel brave enough to live just as much in the world as everybody who has ever existed did before them. Why it is worth distorting the attention system and hobbling the self in order to expose the self less to the human beings immediately around us. That should get not only you and the essay, but all your readers, somewhere interesting and valuable.
>
>
I have recently turned off my phone data entirely; I now only use it as a telephone while on the go and utilize its computing capabilities while on to a trusted web connection. Of course, I still have a data plan, so I know in an emergency (say, if I was hopelessly lost) I could always access the net. But couldn’t I just ask a kind stranger for directions? Do I really need to have this invasive technology as a “safety net?” I have to admit I don’t like the answer, but…no.
 
Changed:
<
<
>
>
The ultimate convenience that technology offers us – and the hardest to part with – is the ability to stay well within our comfort zones. At any moment, we are only interacting with those we want to and expected to interact with. By staying within our comfort zones, we insulate ourselves from new bonds (like striking up a conversation with a stranger) and from new ideas (living in an echo chamber). We must accept that discomfort is part of the human experience before we can break the technological shackles with which we have chained ourselves.
 



TiffanyYoungFirstEssay 2 - 04 Dec 2017 - Main.EbenMoglen
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="FirstEssay"
Line: 18 to 18
 The breakdown is not just happening around us; it is happening within us. We are so enthralled with the online world that it has even changed how we view ourselves. Studies have shown that exposure to social media is correlated to lower self-esteem. At the same time, the thing that brings so much grief also brings great pleasure. Our brains release dopamine every time we get a positive response on social media, and it is this physical response that makes leaving social media so difficult. I suspect the desperate need to prove that we are worthy both to ourselves and to friends on social media drives us further into its gaping maws. Because being on social media lowers self-esteem, online validation means even more to us, leading to more posting and sharing.
Changed:
<
<
Furthermore, the constant bombardment of information means never experiencing boredom again…yet never truly engaging our minds either. Less time is spent with introspection or pondering deeper issues because our brains are never in “default mode” anymore, where we ponder the day’s events and life in general. We also exercise our memories less since any information we want is at our fingertips. And studies have shown multitasking leads to less productivity and efficiency, but again, it is nearly impossible to ignore the endless pings that demand our attention. So, as technology grows ever more cognitive, our brains grow ever less.
>
>
Furthermore, the constant bombardment of information means never experiencing boredom again…yet never truly engaging our minds either. Less time is spent with introspection or pondering deeper issues because our brains are never in “default mode” anymore, where we ponder the day’s events and life in general.

Rather than thinking of this as "default mode," you might use the concept of "turning attention inward." This inward-facing attention, which is also called "interiority," is the basic functional component of what we used to call "the self." Distortion of our attention system through too-insistent stimulation of the external senses compelling attention to be paid outward distorts the self. At the extreme, when it prevents sleep, it causes permanent, potentially fatal, damage to the mind and body. Attaching oneself to a spy-object that aggressively, sporadically, frequently conscripts your attention creates this distortion and interferes with the ongoing synthesis of "the self" through introspection.

We also exercise our memories less since any information we want is at our fingertips. And studies have shown multitasking leads to less productivity and efficiency, but again, it is nearly impossible to ignore the endless pings that demand our attention. So, as technology grows ever more cognitive, our brains grow ever less.

 

Destruction of Trust

Line: 30 to 49
 It is easier to never get into this kind of perpetually plugged-in life than it is to exit after experiencing the convenience. Many of my friends have attempted repeatedly to deleted social media applications from their phones but would inevitably cave and reinstall after a few weeks. Luckily, I never made the initial download, though even then it was hard to put down my phone since it could access the web anywhere.
Changed:
<
<
I think the approach my friends took was not quite right; we have built a way of life around our devices, so we will need time to remove ourselves from that. I think it is possible to grow independent of our electronic minds, albeit slowly and possibly requiring a safety net. I have recently turned off my phone data entirely; I now only use it as a telephone while on the go and utilize its computing capabilities while on to a trusted web connection. Of course, I still have a data plan, so I know if I really need it (say, if I was hopelessly lost in a new city) I could always pull up Google Maps. But I think riding a bike with training wheels is still better than just letting someone else take the wheel.
>
>
I think the approach my friends took was not quite right; we have built a way of life around our devices, so we will need time to remove ourselves from that. I think it is possible to grow independent of our electronic minds, albeit slowly and possibly requiring a safety net. I have recently turned off my phone data entirely; I now only use it as a telephone while on the go and utilize its computing capabilities while on to a trusted web connection. Of course, I still have a data plan, so I know if I really need it (say, if I was hopelessly lost in a new city) I could always pull up Google Maps.

There used to be a thing called "asking directions." It still works.

But I think riding a bike with training wheels is still better than just letting someone else take the wheel.

But the machine is still there, even if you have partially disabled it. As your last hypothesis about getting lost and being helpless shows, it still functions as an amulet against your anxiety. It does so by convincing you that you only need it in order to avoid being lost, that you have no external dependency on society or other people that isn't satisfied by the Net and the spy-object you carry. As your dinner-table story shows, it is still necessary in order to quell the social anxiety people feel in being together, which they can stabilize by showing the food to other people far away, and losing themselves at the table in places that require less risk and vulnerability than actual conversation.

So the next draft should be not about the price of convenience only, but also about the price of anxiety-reduction. About why it is that people don't feel brave enough to live just as much in the world as everybody who has ever existed did before them. Why it is worth distorting the attention system and hobbling the self in order to expose the self less to the human beings immediately around us. That should get not only you and the essay, but all your readers, somewhere interesting and valuable.

 
You are entitled to restrict access to your paper if you want to. But we all derive immense benefit from reading one another's work, and I hope you won't feel the need unless the subject matter is personal and its disclosure would be harmful or undesirable.

TiffanyYoungFirstEssay 1 - 11 Nov 2017 - Main.TiffanyYoung
Line: 1 to 1
Added:
>
>
META TOPICPARENT name="FirstEssay"

What is the price of convenience?

-- By TiffanyYoung - 11 Nov 2017

We are in the age of Big Data. A time where the value of a technology lies not its software but the information that the software gathers and analyzes. The rise of Big Data can be attributed to one thing: convenience. Google, Facebook, Apple, WeChat? – these companies promise convenience in exchange for our information. These companies hail cashless transactions, instant answers online, and easy contact with friends across the globe as the future of humanity. But at what point does convenience begin reshaping society? I think it already has, and for the worse.

Destruction of Human Connection

Social media promises to help us keep connected with our friends no matter where we are. Yet, by subscribing to this, we destroy the connections closest to us. The common complaint about millennials being addicted to their phones is not completely ungrounded. It’s hard to ignore the incessant pings of phone notifications from endless accounts – Instagram, Facebook, Snapchat – linked to your phone. When everything is an instant notification, it’s nearly impossible to focus on any task lasting longer than a few minutes, including spending time with real, physical people.

I often find myself sitting at dinner with several friends, yet failing to find a single pair of eyes to connect with because everyone is glued to their screens. I have also often sat with a grumbling stomach even though food was right in front of me because my friends had decided taking a photo for the internet was more pressing than nourishing our bodies (I would be forbidden from touching my order while they arranged and rearranged the table settings to capture the perfect photo). And unfortunately, I have too often simply given up after repeating a story twice or thrice, ultimately opting to also simply pick up my phone. The problem is, they realize it’s rude. These actions are constantly accompanied with a “sorry I’ll be done really soon,” yet they continue throughout the meetup. Like addictions to drugs, addictions to devices can ruin relationships.

Destruction of Self

The breakdown is not just happening around us; it is happening within us. We are so enthralled with the online world that it has even changed how we view ourselves. Studies have shown that exposure to social media is correlated to lower self-esteem. At the same time, the thing that brings so much grief also brings great pleasure. Our brains release dopamine every time we get a positive response on social media, and it is this physical response that makes leaving social media so difficult. I suspect the desperate need to prove that we are worthy both to ourselves and to friends on social media drives us further into its gaping maws. Because being on social media lowers self-esteem, online validation means even more to us, leading to more posting and sharing.

Furthermore, the constant bombardment of information means never experiencing boredom again…yet never truly engaging our minds either. Less time is spent with introspection or pondering deeper issues because our brains are never in “default mode” anymore, where we ponder the day’s events and life in general. We also exercise our memories less since any information we want is at our fingertips. And studies have shown multitasking leads to less productivity and efficiency, but again, it is nearly impossible to ignore the endless pings that demand our attention. So, as technology grows ever more cognitive, our brains grow ever less.

Destruction of Trust

Rather than trusting other humans, it seems people are choosing to place their trust in the very companies that aim to manipulate them. The introduction of Amazon Key is a prime (no pun intended) example. Amazon Key is a keypad door lock that comes with a security camera and an app. We don’t trust our neighbors to not steal our packages, yet we trust Amazon to enter our homes. And indeed, people are now handing a retail company real-time footage of their homes as well as the passcodes to their front doors.

A more personal anecdote of people placing their trust in technology and the companies that control it: my mother is a very private woman, who refuses even to use her real name on Facebook. Yet, she has no problem telling her phone “OK Google, take me home,” even though she acknowledges she never actually entered her home address. It seems there is a sense of security with our technology. Perhaps it’s the fact that our phones are always beside us – our trusty right-hand robot – so we can lull ourselves into believing there aren’t people behind our devices. But this lack of understanding (perhaps even self-deception) is exactly why China’s social credit plan even has a chance of working.

Baby Steps

It is easier to never get into this kind of perpetually plugged-in life than it is to exit after experiencing the convenience. Many of my friends have attempted repeatedly to deleted social media applications from their phones but would inevitably cave and reinstall after a few weeks. Luckily, I never made the initial download, though even then it was hard to put down my phone since it could access the web anywhere.

I think the approach my friends took was not quite right; we have built a way of life around our devices, so we will need time to remove ourselves from that. I think it is possible to grow independent of our electronic minds, albeit slowly and possibly requiring a safety net. I have recently turned off my phone data entirely; I now only use it as a telephone while on the go and utilize its computing capabilities while on to a trusted web connection. Of course, I still have a data plan, so I know if I really need it (say, if I was hopelessly lost in a new city) I could always pull up Google Maps. But I think riding a bike with training wheels is still better than just letting someone else take the wheel.


You are entitled to restrict access to your paper if you want to. But we all derive immense benefit from reading one another's work, and I hope you won't feel the need unless the subject matter is personal and its disclosure would be harmful or undesirable. To restrict access to your paper simply delete the "#" character on the next two lines:

Note: TWiki has strict formatting rules for preference declarations. Make sure you preserve the three spaces, asterisk, and extra space at the beginning of these lines. If you wish to give access to any other users simply add them to the comma separated ALLOWTOPICVIEW list.


Revision 3r3 - 27 Dec 2017 - 17:23:16 - TiffanyYoung
Revision 2r2 - 04 Dec 2017 - 19:35:01 - EbenMoglen
Revision 1r1 - 11 Nov 2017 - 01:16:06 - TiffanyYoung
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM